Sinah A. Anthropological interpretations of freedom of creativity in modern philosophy

In the dissertation it is considered and resolved the problem of freedom of creativity in modern philosophy. In work the thesis that freedom and creativity have dialectically interconnected character is proved. They presuppose and generate each other. Views of philosophers during different epoch were defined by many factors: the sociopolitical environment, dominating ideology, a level of development of a science and culture. The declared problem has appeared in the field of existing paradigms, which were generated as a result of influence on outlook of philosophers those objective conditions and subjective factors which are set naturally by each epoch. Therefore are clear in time strict determinism of Democritus and Spinoza; fatalism of the Stoicks; providentialism (doctrine about divine predefiniteness) of Augustine; moderate determinism of Epicurus and Kant; indeterminism of Socrates and Hegel; absolutization of freedom in existentialism; understanding freedom of creativity as unity of microcosm and macrocosm in cosmism; inbasicity in M. Heidegger's and N. Berdyaev's philosophy. The writer of a thesis has proved principal types and intensions of creativity, has actualized classification of freedoms and has revealed their level-organization. In the dissertation the essence of concepts "freedom", "creativity" and "freedom of creativity" is disclosed, their interpretation in various philosophical doctrines is presented, and also semantics and etymology of these terms in the literary critique is grounded. In research point that creativity inseparably connected with cognition is proved, their dialectic interrelation and interdependence is considered.