Pikh Y. General characteristic of secularization and desecularization of legal systems of religious type

In the thesis a complex dolzhenzhenya processes of secularization and desecularization of legal systems of a religious type. The thesis covers modern approaches to the classification of legal systems and it is determinable that in comparative jurisprudence there is no uniform position on what legal families exist. It was established that, in the theoretical aspect, classifications help to regulate various legal systems on the basis of their common and specific features, ensures the convenience of their study. The analysis of criteria for the classification of legal systems was carried out for the analysis of general theoretical aspects of secularization and resecularization in religious legal systems and their place on the legal map of the world, elucidation of the legal nature and features of religious legal systems and with a view to their further classification. It is noted that the basis of modern religious legal legal systems and their separate legal institutions form the value-normative positions formed and formalized in the sacred texts (the Bible, the Koran), and despite the secular nature of many state and legal spaces, is the fundamental basis for the development of the normative legal regulation, legitimation of the results of legal activity, and the like. The processes of secularization and desecularization in the legal systems of Muslim states are analyzed and internal contradictions and conflicts in the interaction of secular and spiritual are revealed. The uniqueness of relations and religious institutions in Israel is analyzed. It is determined that in Israel religious institutions are not separated from the state, unlike in Ukraine and most Western countries. It is noted that the complexity of the processes of interaction of legal norms with other social norms lies in the fact that in each concrete case it can manifest itself in different ways. In some cases, these norms can complement each other, while in others they are mutually interchangeable. The specificity of each social regulator, by which law and religion, allows the most efficiently coordinated influence on public relations in order to achieve socially significant goals. Law and religion in the process of socionormative regulation are self-sufficient social regulators, the variety of unique properties of which is revealed in their interaction.