The aim of the research based on historical-philosophical material in frames of heritages of H.-G. Gadamer, J. Derrida, P. de Man to substantiate and prove the scientific hypothesis, according to which hermeneutic potential of deconstruction discovers in frame of semiotic space ‘language – text – interpretator’ as complementarian intention of interpretation (understanding / disclosure), that leads to saturation of critical measuring of humanitarian knowledge.
The object of research is philosophical heritages of H.-G. Gadamer, J. Derrida, P. de Man in the horizon of contemporary historical-philosophical problematics.
The subject of research is topological, content, methodological aspects of hermeneutic potential of deconstruction in frames of heritages of H.-G. Gadamer, J. Derrida, P. de Man.
Methodology of research, that used in the thesis, based on principles of historicity, comparability, complementarity. Subject-conceptual historical philosophical substantiating and proving of the scientific hypothesis about hermeneutic potential of deconstruction the way articulation of its topological, content, methodological aspects is carried on using possibilities of phenomenology, structuralism, dialectics, comparative analysis etc.
Using possibilities of phenomenology, firstly, markup of semiotic space ‘language – text – interpreter’ as a space of realization of hermeneutic potential of deconstruction is carried on, secondly, description of concept thesaurus of hermeneutic (language, text, writing, interpretation, hermeneutic circle etc.) and deconstruction (writing, intertextuality, supplement, difference, trace etc.) is explicated.
Using possibilities of structuralism, firstly, some binary oppositions: ‘text / interpretation’, ‘wholeness / plurality’, ‘language / writing’, ‘blindness / insight’ are articulated, secondly, architectonics the thesis, which consists of three conceptual parts is built: the first part contains key problems of hermeneutic of text, the second part contains key problems of deconstruction of text, the third part contains possibilities of conjunction of hermeneutic and deconstruction.
Using dialectics, key antinomies between hermeneutic and deconstruction in limits of interpretation, logocentrism, destruction of history of ontology are articulated.
Using comparative methodology, comparing of views of H.G. Gadamer and J. Derrida, P. de Man and J. Derrida, P. de Man and M. Bakhtin etc. are carried on.
Scientific novelty of the thesis.
For the first time: on the basis of the complex historical-philosophical analysis of heritage of H.-G. Gadamer, J. Derrida, P. de Man substantiating and proving of the scientific hypothesis about hermeneutic potential of deconstruction in topological, content and methodological aspects are carried on; based on realization of influence of philosophical hermeneutic of H.-G. Gadamer and deconstruction of J. Derrida on literary-critical views of P. de Man the topos of discovering of hermeneutic potential of deconstruction – ‘language – text – interpreter’ and heuristic measuring of concept of interpretation are set; based on articulation of conceptual-methodological parts of hermeneutic of H.-G. Gadamer (language, text, writing, reading etc.) and deconstruction of J. Derrida (writing, intertextuality, supplement, difference etc.) content sings of interpretation – mediation, entelechy, dialogicality, on the one hand, and intention to another, plural, covering, on the other, which gaining heuristic compounding in activity of P. de Man as complementarity of understanding and disclosure are done; based on analysis of polemics of P. de Man with views of J. Derrida, M. Bakhtin, F. Nietzsche, M. Blanchot, R.M. Rilke etc., showed that methodological foundation of hermeneutic potential of deconstruction is interpretative procedure of double deconstruction (or deconstruction of deconstruction) and thereby critical aspects of comprehension of texts in conceptual frames of opposition ‘blindness / insight’ are clarified.
Get further development:
– methodological possibilities of compounding of hermeneutic and deconstruction in directions of critical comprehension of texts and social-cultural dialogue.
Specified:
– the place of interpretation in the context of hermeneutic of H.-G. Gadamer, deconstruction of J. Derrida, hermeneutic deconstruction of P. de Man.
Sphere - educational process.
