The actual scientific task has been solved in the work, which consists in scientific substantiation of theoretical and methodological bases of ensuring economic security under the conditions of digitalization and development of practical proposals dealing with improvement of this process.
The definition of the concepts "economic security", "information and economic security", "economic danger of the individual", "economic and psychological security of the individual" has been formulated. A model of economic behavior under the influence of destructive factors has been proposed, which states that the condition of the economy is affected by challenges and threats on the one hand, and on the other hand, by the consequences of the risks’ implementation that depend on management decisions.
The main components and factors of the state economic security under the conditions of a digital society formation have been analyzed. Focused attentiveness is placed on the fact that today the role of information security of the national economy is significantly increasing, so it should be identified as an independent component of economic security. The main factors of the state economic security system, which influence the quality of its provision, have been defined and are divided into two general groups: external and internal.
The international experience in the formation of the state economic security on the example of the United States of America, the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Poland, Asian countries has been considered, and promising areas for Ukraine have been highlighted.
Modern information threats to the economic security of Ukraine have been highlighted. The need to change the paradigm of cyber security strategy has been detected, and it should be based not on responding to the facts, but on the principle of forecasting and planning protection against future actions of cybercriminals, which requires constant analysis of current trends in economic cyber threats.
The proposed model reflects the relationship of security factors with a focus on ensuring economic stability and sustainability, as the main conditions for progressive economic development, which is of scientific interest to deepen knowledge and acquirement of effective government regulation skills.
The influence of economic danger, information threats on a person, his personal reactions to modern information and psychological stresses, which allowed predicting the consequences at the personal, social and state levels, has been studied. An analysis of the methodological tools condition for assessing the state economic security has been executed. Changes to approaches to assessing economic security at the level of the state, institutions, industry, and the individual have been proposed.
A model of economic-personal interaction synchronization has been developed, which consists of the connection of structural components of the "personality-economy-state" system, determination of their influence on each other, taking into account the main, additional external and internal factors.
The result of our own theoretical and empirical research was the development of a strategic model of economic security, consisting of the following components: crystallization of the mission and objectives of economic security, analysis of external and internal risks, task planning, formation and implementation of the strategy, management and control. The developed model is based on a human-centered approach, in turn; the basis of development is the audit of economic activity of the individual, society, and state, tangible and intangible production.
It has been determined that the improvement of public administration should include: overcoming of the declarative nature of legislation and reducing the gap between legislation and practice in the information and economic sphere, creating new institutions that define the framework of interaction and rules of behavior to ensure economic stability and endurance. The solution to the problem of economic security should be comprehensive and systematic at various levels: regulatory, institutional, regional, and personal.
