The dissertation solves an actual scientific task, which consists in the theoretical and methodological substantiation of the scientific foundations of the development of anti-crisis public administration in Ukraine and the development of practical recommendations for improving the mechanisms of its implementation in the economic sphere.
The dissertation study proposed a model for optimizing the mechanisms of anti-crisis public management in the economic sphere of Ukraine, in the context of which the improvement of its institutional framework is considered (presupposes the adoption of the Law of Ukraine «On State Strategic Planning», the development of a five-year program for the modernization of the economy, the establishment of target indicators for the work of state development institutes , corporations and agencies aimed at creating a new technological system; promoting the use of advanced management technologies at the level of micro-, meso- and macro-levels of economic systems, etc.), financial and economic (provides for the balancing of the tax and budget policy of the country; optimization of the national financial investment system; stabilization of the financial market; implementation of price liberalization, regulation of prices (tariffs) for individual goods (services) and control over their containment; protection and expansion of the internal market and preservation of production potential; optimization of the infrastructure of the economy, including its modernization and creation of «growth points « for the new post-industrial society) and information provision (implies the creation of centralized databases, the development of business analytics and monitoring systems, as well as the use of artificial intelligence and other innovative tools of anti-crisis public management; personnel training in the field of information security, statistics, data analysis and other related areas; introduction of information cyber security measures; updating and adapting information systems to changes in the economy and finance, taking into account modern trends and new technologies, etc.).
The author outlines possible ways of implementing the best international experience of anti-crisis public administration in Ukraine, namely: increasing national production; more centralized capital investment in selected areas of production; choosing a clear specialization of the state to avoid resource losses; creation of policy and business adaptation mechanisms, which involves the implementation of tools; rethinking approaches to the development and use of local economic potential; development and implementation of support programs for small and medium-sized enterprises; promoting the development of infrastructure to support business, such as transport, energy and information infrastructure; attracting foreign investments and creating a favorable investment climate for attracting capital to Ukraine; development of the innovative sector of the economy by supporting research and development, technological start-ups and the transition to the use of modern technologies; support of social programs to reduce poverty and inequality in society.
In addition, the ways of anti-crisis post-war recovery and sustainable economic development of the country after the end of the military conflict are given: stabilization of the macroeconomic situation (inflation control and ensuring a stable exchange rate of the hryvnia, development of a budget aimed at recovery and development); infrastructure investments (restoration and development of infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, airports, ports, etc., which were damaged during the war; attraction of investments for the modern development of transport infrastructure); support of small and medium-sized businesses (providing financial support and benefits for small enterprises; simplification of business procedures and reform of the tax system to increase competitiveness; education and training (development of education and professional training aimed at economic recovery; formation of programs for improving the skills of the workforce, so that they can work in new areas); development of trade and investment (attraction of foreign investment and development of foreign trade; development of trade agreements and cooperation with international organizations); social protection and reintegration (provision of social protection and rehabilitation of veterans and victims of the conflict; programs of psychological support and social reintegration for those affected by war).
Key words: interaction of public authorities, public administration, mechanisms of public administration, crisis, anti-crisis administration, anti-crisis public administration, economy, economic crisis, public administration in crisis conditions.
